← Verified deployment matrix
L1SystemMatrix rank #7
Figure AI
Figure 02 · BMW reports results of Figure 02 production pilot
Login required; votes do not affect ranking
Project details
Sheet-metal positioning for welding during a completed ten-month production pilot; not a claim of an ongoing fleet rollout.
- Customer
- BMW Group
- Location
- Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
- Data as-of
- 2025
- Last verified
- 2026-10-11
- Vehicles supported · 2025
- 30,000+
- Components handled · 2025
- 90,000+
- Operating hours · 2025
- ~1,250
One primary customer source reviewed; no independent triangulation or commercial contract verification claimed.
Evidence list
Admin-curated primary/supporting rows plus all public proof links (same set as matrix cards).
| Role | Type | Source | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Customer statement | BMW Group | Customer-reported results of the 2025 production pilot. | bmwgroup.com ↗ |
Audit checklist
Transparent process. Green check = pass, yellow circle = disputed.
| Category | Item | Pass standard | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Basic completeness | Title, company, product, location, customer (if any), and dates complete | Required fields complete; no vague wording | — |
| Task description is concrete (not marketing fluff) | Clear real work (e.g. “move totes onto a conveyor”) | — | |
| 2. Official sources | Official company announcement / press release / site statement | Clickable primary URL matches the case claim | — |
| Shipment / ops metrics from formal channels | Prefer official milestones / verifiable pages; “projected” PR numbers don’t count | — | |
| Revenue figure has a public source (if shown) | Link + as-of date if shown; leave blank if not disclosed | — | |
| 3. Independent cross-check | Customer confirmation or independent third-party report | At least one source independent of the vendor (customer, media, report) | — |
| Numbers consistent across sources | No material conflict on key metrics | — | |
| No obvious exaggeration or self-contradiction | No major contradiction vs prior public claims | — | |
| 4. Visual / video evidence | Clear deployment video or photos | Shows real work, not lab-only demos | — |
| No obvious AI-generated or over-edited artifacts | No clear physics glitches, warped people, or bad backgrounds | — | |
| 5. Timing & consistency | Metrics have clear as-of dates | Every number has a time window (e.g. “FY2025”) | — |
| Last verification date recorded | Review date filled | — | |
| Consistent with historical claims | No material conflict with prior company disclosures | — | |
| 6. Commercial / scene reality | Clearly real commercial / production setting | Not exhibition-only, pure internal test, or promo event | — |
| Commercial model stated (sale / RaaS / pilot) | Stated or clearly inferable from evidence | — | |
| 7. Risk & transparency | Known disputes or negative coverage checked | No major undisclosed red flags on basic search | — |
| Uncertain claims are labeled | Speculation / unconfirmed points are marked | — |
Community discussion
Discuss value & outlook. Registered login required to post.
Figure AI · Figure 02
Ranking: first 5 user submissions this month pinned (home badge wall) → then level → newer within a level.