Agility Robotics
Digit · Digit commercial RaaS tote handling at GXO
Commercial RaaS tote handling at GXO
Project details
Takes totes from collaborative robots and places them on conveyors; multi-task warehouse handling under a commercial RaaS deployment.
- Customer
- GXO Logistics
- Location
- Flowery Branch / related facilities, Georgia, USA
- Data as-of
- 2025
- Last verified
- 2026-08-05
- Totes moved · 2025
- 100,000+
- Operating hours · 2025
- 65,000+ hours
- Deploy footprint · 2024
- Multi-customer commercial sites
GXO multi-year RaaS (GlobeNewswire customer PR, Source: GXO Logistics; Adrian Stoch quote) + Agility co-release mirror + 100k-tote post + warehouse video. Metrics from Agility commercial milestone (Nov 2025).
Evidence list
Admin-curated primary/supporting rows plus all public proof links (same set as matrix cards).
| Role | Type | Source | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Independent customer statement | GXO Logistics (GlobeNewswire) | — | globenewswire.com ↗ |
| Supporting | Official company news | Agility Robotics | — | agilityrobotics.com ↗ |
| Supporting | Official company news | Agility Robotics | — | agilityrobotics.com ↗ |
| Supporting | Checkable video | Agility / warehouse | — | youtube.com ↗ |
| Supporting | Third-party report | Robotics & Automation News | — | roboticsandautomationnews.com ↗ |
| Supporting | Public link | Agility Robotics | — | agilityrobotics.com ↗ |
Audit checklist
Transparent process. Green check = pass, yellow circle = disputed.
| Category | Item | Pass standard | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Basic completeness | Title, company, product, location, customer (if any), and dates complete | Required fields complete; no vague wording | ✓ |
| Task description is concrete (not marketing fluff) | Clear real work (e.g. “move totes onto a conveyor”) | ✓ | |
| 2. Official sources | Official company announcement / press release / site statement | Clickable primary URL matches the case claim | ✓ |
| Shipment / ops metrics from formal channels | Prefer official milestones / verifiable pages; “projected” PR numbers don’t count | ✓ | |
| Revenue figure has a public source (if shown) | Link + as-of date if shown; leave blank if not disclosed | ✓ | |
| 3. Independent cross-check | Customer confirmation or independent third-party report | At least one source independent of the vendor (customer, media, report) | ✓ |
| Numbers consistent across sources | No material conflict on key metrics | ✓ | |
| No obvious exaggeration or self-contradiction | No major contradiction vs prior public claims | ✓ | |
| 4. Visual / video evidence | Clear deployment video or photos | Shows real work, not lab-only demos | ✓ |
| No obvious AI-generated or over-edited artifacts | No clear physics glitches, warped people, or bad backgrounds | ✓ | |
| 5. Timing & consistency | Metrics have clear as-of dates | Every number has a time window (e.g. “FY2025”) | ✓ |
| Last verification date recorded | Review date filled | ✓ | |
| Consistent with historical claims | No material conflict with prior company disclosures | ✓ | |
| 6. Commercial / scene reality | Clearly real commercial / production setting | Not exhibition-only, pure internal test, or promo event | ✓ |
| Commercial model stated (sale / RaaS / pilot) | Stated or clearly inferable from evidence | ✓ | |
| 7. Risk & transparency | Known disputes or negative coverage checked | No major undisclosed red flags on basic search | ✓ |
| Uncertain claims are labeled | Speculation / unconfirmed points are marked | ✓ |
Community discussion
Discuss value & outlook. Registered login required to post.
Agility Robotics · Digit
Ranking: first 5 user submissions this month pinned (home badge wall) → then level → newer within a level.